🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions about that remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over the American player during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is American – and sports frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown would have been appropriate. Instead, Fowler brought up the continued drought of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the previous seven grand slams (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact preferred his draw, because it presented the opportunity to defeat the top three competitors in the world in succession. He is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing between her and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of ranking points away. His top-class delivery and concussive strength on each front side and backhand are more than adequate to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the select few generational talents, though, he is often overmatched. The past few years has seen the interesting emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising speed and fluidity of much shorter players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

The American has made a number of dramatic, improbable improvements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly surged up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a win that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz creating numerous opportunities to break. But Djokovic saved break point after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the brink of frustration. When he eventually did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a terrible game to drop serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to use far too much effort to prevail. Facing set points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to the sky. He extended the contest two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, only a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling proof that the American is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the following match and never especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has developed sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating Fritz to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, more so than virtually anyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only express his emotions or the tactic he felt determined a contest, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States not produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually extremely unlikely for all other players. {